AWS vs Google Cloud
A side-by-side view of the AWS and Google Cloud configurations in this catalogue, plus the account-model difference that usually decides it.
AWS and Google Cloud are the two platforms people weigh against each other most often, and the decision is rarely about raw capacity. What differs is how each one organises an account, how quickly a new environment becomes usable, and which configurations are available here today.
Configurations and prices in the catalogue
Both tables below are read from the live product records each time this page loads, so they always match the product pages.
The account model is the real difference
In AWS the account is the boundary. Resources live inside an account, permissions are written inside it, and the bill is drawn against it. Separating two workloads properly means separating accounts.
Google Cloud puts the project in that role. A billing account is attached to one or more projects, and a project is cheap to create and cheap to delete. Separating workloads usually means another project rather than another account.
That single difference shapes what follows: how you isolate a client, how you cap spend, how you hand an environment over, and how much cleanup a finished piece of work needs.
Where each one tends to fit
AWS suits
- Teams that already have AWS-shaped tooling, IAM policies or infrastructure code.
- Work that needs a very wide service catalogue in one place.
- Setups where a hard account boundary per client or per environment is a requirement.
Google Cloud suits
- Teams that create and tear down isolated environments frequently.
- Work that leans on managed data and analytics services.
- Anyone who wants per-project billing views without running many separate accounts.
What to check before you buy
- Which configuration above matches the vCPU count, credit balance or service access you actually need.
- Whether your workload depends on a region that has to be chosen at setup time.
- Whether quotas on a new environment cover your intended instance sizes. Quotas, not funds, are the usual first blocker.
- How you will rotate credentials and record ownership once the account is in your hands.
For the longer written comparison, read AWS and Google Cloud: How the Two Models Differ in the Cloud Library.
Questions
Yes. The configuration tables are generated from the same product records that power the AWS and Google Cloud product pages, so they change whenever the catalogue changes.
Compare the tables rather than the platforms. The starting configuration differs per provider, and the figure that matters is the one for the configuration you will actually run.
Every provider lists its full set of configurations on its own product page, and the Cloud Matrix covers the pairings people ask about most.
More comparisons
Each comparison covers the characteristics that usually decide between two providers.
AWS vs Azure
AWS and Azure configurations side by side, with the tenant and subscription structure that makes Azure feel different from day one.
Open comparisonGoogle Cloud vs Azure
Google Cloud and Azure configurations side by side, and how projects compare with tenants and subscriptions in day-to-day use.
Open comparisonDigitalOcean vs Linode
Two developer-focused providers compared on configurations, price and the details that actually differ once you are logged in.
Open comparisonHetzner vs DigitalOcean
European resource pricing against a broad managed platform, with both sets of configurations shown side by side.
Open comparisonOVHcloud vs Hetzner
Two European providers compared on configurations, price and the practical details that separate them.
Open comparisonLinode vs UpCloud
Developer tooling against storage performance, with both sets of configurations and prices shown side by side.
Open comparison